Work At Home Employment: How Can You Find Out Which Work At Home Employment Site Is The Best?
Hi there, I’ve been recently unemployed, and want to find work at home employment. Now I’ve checked many of the “free” sites that have lists of jobs, but most of them are crappy surveys, and the legit work at home employment listings are usually out of date, or already taken. Anyone have any good experiences [...]
Affiliate Highest Revenue Home Bar Gear
Kegworks Highest Revenue Home Bar Gear from Affiliate Sales. The following are the 5 highest revenue products for KegWorks.com for last month (August 2009): SKU #: DD50-1-B Beverage Air 2 Kegerator – Tap Unit Model #DD50 – Black SKU #: BAR650XX Cambro Portable Catering Banquet Bar – Large Size SKU #:SBC490BIBRS-7 Summit Built-In Commercial Keg Refrigerator – Brass SKU #:HBF05EBSS Haier Kegerator with Stainless Steel Door and Cabinet SKU #:SCR600BL Summit Glass Door Free Standing Refrigerator – 5.5 cu. ft. – Black Not Yet an Affiliate? Sign-up for our affiliate program here For more information about KegWorks.com LinkShare affiliate program, please click here KegWorks.com – No one knows home bar supplies and equipment like we do!
Increased Commission Contest
KegWorks Increased Commission Contest Earn an increased commission until the end of Sept! Here's the deal: Reach 10 accumulated orders in the month of June, July or August and you’ll have 7% commission until the end of Sept 2009. When you reach 10 orders, please send me an email to bump you up from the 5% base to 7% commission. Not Yet an Affiliate? Sign-up for our affiliate program here For more information about KegWorks.com LinkShare affiliate program, please click here KegWorks.com – No one knows home bar supplies and equipment like we do!
Google’s No-Follow Changes Explained
Last Tuesday, we discussed the idea of Google potentially making some changes to PageRank and it’s relationship to no-follow – particularly in the context of PageRank sculpting. As a quick refresher, PageRank sculpting is the practice whereby you add no-follow attributes to less important links in order to emphasize links you deem more important. We used an analogy of a bucket withe holes in it. The holes represented your outbound links. Your website’s PageRank (link juice) flowed thru the holes. The fewer holes you had, higher the percentage of your link juice went thru the remaining holes (links). That’s PageRank Sculpting in a nutshell. Dividing your link authority by a smaller number of links in order to maximize the authority you pass on. At the end of our article, we mentioned that no official word on how Google was going to change the dynamic between no-follow and PageRank, but as of last night, we now know a little more. Matt Cutts made a post on his blog about the way Google has decided to deal with the issue. The biggest surprise in the post was actually Matt’s claim that this change went into effect “over a year ago” but nobody noticed. Beyond that, Matt’s explanation of PR Sculpting fit pretty nicely into our analogy. Matt said “nofollowed links didn’t count toward the denominator when dividing PageRank by the outdegree of the page”. Which basically means, if you plugged some of the holes in your bucket, the remaining holes received a higher percentage of your link authority. This statement is also significant because it pretty much (by definition) says unequivocally that Pagerank sculpting ‘worked’ conceptually at least. But that’s ‘worked’ with an emphasis on the past tense. The change Google implemented ‘over a year ago’ according to Cutts. Made Google count the outbound links regardless of the no-follow attribute. To paraphrase Matt in his post, if you have 10 PageRank points on a page with 10 outbound links and you put no-follow on 5 of the links, each of your 5 remaining links would pass just 1 point of PageRank now. Prior to the change, each of your 5 links without no-follow would pass 2 points apiece. Now, your PR passing ability is spread out or divided by all of your links – regardless of their no-follow status. Matt does a pretty good job of anticipating several questions that will doubtlessly arise from his post. I’ll Highlight a couple of the more important points below, but would also urge you to go check out the real thing (like you haven’t already…) Whenever you are linking within your site, don’t use no-follow Q: Since PR is divided amongst outbound links, no-follow or not, should I turn off comments on my blog? “A: I wouldn’t recommend closing comments in an attempt to “hoard” your PageRank. In the same way that Google trusts sites less when they link to spammy sites or bad neighborhoods, parts of our system encourage links to good sites.” So, there you go. The debate that arose during SMX Advanced as to whether or not Google was changing how they handled no-follow in terms of PR sculpting has now been answered. The big surprise in all of this is that they apparently changed it all a while back, but at the end of the day it was pretty much the change we were anticipating anyway. Namely, no-follow links do not pass PR, no-follow links do not pass anchor text value, but no-follow links DO count toward your total of outbound links. The obvious question this creates I suppose then is: why, then, should we no-follow anything?
Link Marketing for Drop Shipping Retailers
It can be challenging to develop links for drop shipping sites, since many of these sites are selling the exact same products. Finding a unique angle to separate your site from the rest of the pack is the key to link development. …
Google PageRank: Sullivan & Cutts discuss nofollow
PageRank sculpting is a pretty advanced SEO tactic, and it has been widely used by SEO pros since Google’s Matt Cutts described its use on YouTube, giving the strategy the official green light. At SMX Advanced in Seattle, the same harbinger of Google insider information offered a stunning revelation: Google changed the way it handled link structures intended for sculpting. Coverage of SMX Advanced continues at WebProNews Videos . Stay with WebProNews for more updates and videos from the event this week. An Explanation of PageRank Sculpting (If you know already, skip to next heading.) PageRank sculpting works for sites that already have a high PageRank and, as a result, have a lot of “juice” to pass around. Webmasters looking to have more control over which pages appear in Google’s search results would thus harness the trust (juice) Google gave their site to boost certain pages they consider important while blocking other unimportant or less useful pages. For example, a webmaster may find that a sign-in page or contact page appears in the search results but a page more useful to the end user digging around the Net doesn’t, perhaps because the Googlebot hasn’t been able to locate it. The webmaster could help “sculpt” different pages’ rankings by adding a nofollow tag on links pointing to unimportant pages while linking to preferred pages. In this sense, PageRank was seen as a finite amount of energy to divvy up among a certain number of pages. If you have 10 liters of PageRank juice to distribute, you could deprive one page of receiving any juice and evenly divide the rest among pages needing a boost. With six links, one is nofollowed, the rest normal, giving the Googlebot directions on where to crawl while passing on two liters of juice per page. Google cleared this practice in 2007 by using it with YouTube. The video site links to random videos from the homepage, and as such, when the Googlebot came by, it would pass on the tremendous amount of juice YouTube carried to those random videos. Google used PageRank sculpting to keep it fair and prevent favoritism of certain videos in the search results. That Was Then, This Is Now Matt Cutts Using the 10 liters of juice model, if a webmaster had ten links, blocks five, then five got two liters and five got none. If the webmaster unblocked five, then the juice was evenly redistributed. It also worked in reverse. If a webmaster had distributed the juice among the ten but decided to dam up five, then the juice would evenly redistribute two liters to the preferred five pages. But, according to Matt Cutts, in a Q&A moderated by Danny Sullivan at SMX Advanced, that’s all changed. Now, if the webmaster dams up five, that half still receives nothing, but the remaining half remains at one liter each instead of being boosted up to two liters. Now, instead of having a certain amount juice to distribute as a webmaster likes, Google allows only that select pages be deprived of juice. And where does that all that excess PageRank juice go? “You can almost think of it as just evaporating,” said Cutts, and one imagines the number of stomachs turning over at that moment. It’s important to note that Cutts said Google would not penalize a site for PageRank sculpting, but Cutts did suggest the practice wasn’t a great use of a webmaster’s time unless using nofollow for sign-in pages, RSS subscribe links, et cetera. Highlights From the Cutts Q&A Regarding PageRank Sculpting Cutts on penalties It’s not gonna get you a penalty. You’re not gonna get in trouble or anything. We’re not gonna say "oh all of these internal links are nofollowed" or anything like that. However, it’s not as effective, so it’s definitely a better use of your time to go and make new content. Cutts on sculpting If you’re using nofollow to change how PageRank flows around within your site, it’s almost like a band-aid. It’s better to make your site the way you want PageRank to flow from the beginning, and then it’s good for users, and it’s good for search engines. So how you choose to link within your site is your own business, and I would tell people you can try to sculpt PageRank, but it’s not gonna be as useful. So I would urge people to make new content or think about how to link within your site. Put your best products right up on your root page, and things like that. And that’s gonna be a much better way to "sculpt" PageRank than using nofollow. Cutts on site architecture What we’ve been saying from the beginning is don’t spend as much of your time on the PR sculpting aspect of it. Spend your time making good site architecture so that PageRank just flows wherever you want. That’s why we’ve been saying use it sparingly. Don’t use it for links you can’t vouch for. Don’t use it for user-generated content that you don’t necessarily trust. And this is all up on the HTML documentation page made for rel="nofollow”. Cutts on nofollow use : If you are a power user and there’s a specific page you don’t want like a sign up page or a login page, that’s a fine way to use nofollow. For example if you look at mattcutts.com, the only thing I have nofollow on (I believe) is my subscribe link and that’s because it goes to an RSS feed, which is really not all that useful for the main web index. So for me personally, I tend not to use nofollow on my own internal links Chris Crum provided some notes for this article.
SEO Challenges of Restructuring a Site
It’s one thing to make simple changes, where a page on the new site corresponds exactly to every page on your old site. But it’s much tougher when you’re making more fundamental changes to the layout, organization, and content of your site. ..
For Those Who Still Don’t Get Twitter – ShoeMoney® [del.icio.us]
"I know what most of you are thinking…. “Well if I had 30k followers I could get traffic too” You would probably be surprised to learn that less then 5% of the twitter traffic came from my tweets." It's time I asked Jeremy if I could pick his brain. If he says yes to an interview, what would you want to know?
How To Make the DiggBar Work for You
While there has been a rather large commotion (mostly negative) about the recent release of the DiggBar we have been watching and tracking its usage to find out how the community actually uses it. Surprisingly, we have found many beneficial aspects to the bar, and discovered a handful of ways that you can use the DiggBar or a shortened URL ( DiggURL) help your success on Digg. (If you haven’t seen the DiggBar yet, check the following video) Who Sees The DiggBar Many people will argue that framing a website is intrinsically evil. If you are one of this mindset, I would like to say that Digg’s most recent changes have honestly attempted to make the frame visible only to those who choose to view it, though it still does frame a website. So before we get into the benefits of the DiggBar, we can take a look at who will and will not see the DiggBar to begin with: 1. Users who don’t have a Digg account won’t see it When the DiggBar first was released, all Digg users were sent to the DiggBar’ed story (unless they chose to always have it shut off.) After a large outcry from casual users of the site and publishers, Digg went ahead and removed it completely on outbound links for users who were not currently logged in with a Digg account. What this means: The casual bloggers/publishers/lurkers who are trolling for stories on the site will never be fed a story that is DiggBar’ed unless they are currently logged in with the DiggBar turned on. They will receive the clean link directly to the source. 2. Users with a Digg account who dislike can opt to NEVER see it One of the nice things that Digg did do with the bar is to make it extremely easy to turn it off forever. There are two easy ways that you can use to turn off the DiggBar: from the DiggBar Itself from your personal options Now, the really cool feature of the shortened DiggURL is that, even if you have an account and someone sends you that shortened URL (and your preferences are off), you will be redirected to the story page. The only way that you can ever see the DiggBar is if you opt to by manually typing digg.com/ before your URL . What this means: Not all Diggers will see the DiggBar. Unlike those horridly annoying ow.ly domains from HootSuite on Twitter, BurnURL or any other framed in service – the DiggBar is essentially only shown to those who actually want to see it. 3. If you don’t want anyone to see it, you can choose not to While the DiggBar was intended to help Diggers find great content and vote on it, at the end of the day, it is your site and you can choose to not allow anyone to frame it. Many sites (even the New York Times) bust frames, so even those users who opt in to view the DiggBar will be directed to the main article. Here are some resources on how to break frames: Breaking Out of Frames with JavaScript Wikipedia includes a JavaScript variation that includes a popup as to why you will be redirected Also, if you have a WordPress blog, the plugin “ Diggbarred ” can be installed to block the DiggBar in its entirety. What this means: If you finish reading this article and still hate the DiggBar, you can make sure that nobody else out there will see it … even if they wanted to. How the DiggBar Can Help You So even though the DiggBar does frame a website, you can use this frame to your advantage, here’s how: 1. This one of the largest ‘approved’ ways to share your content off-site Digg has been known to enforce very stringent bannings on violations of Digg’s Terms of Use. However, this form of promotion and sharing is not only acceptable, but encouraged. The DiggBar allows you to share by email, Facebook or Twitter. Emailing has always been an approved method of sharing, but now you can share your submissions directly on Twitter win a 100% approved fashion: 2. It allows for a quick check to see if a story has been submitted Digg has not been the most receptive to the use of its API to aid users. Instead of relying on 3 rd party add-ons or plugins, you can now simply toss a “digg.com/” in front of any address to see if it has been previously submitted. This is a simple and easy way to see if a story you find has already been submitted. 3. You can share content and people will know your intent (& you won’t look spammy) On Twitter or Facebook if you are attempting to share your story to increase the number of diggs, many times non-users simply don’t understand. When sharing a DiggUrl, those who have an account and proper permission will see the DiggBar and give a vote if worthy, those who don’t participate in Digg will just be served the regular page – no harm done. Before the DiggUrl and DiggBar, users on Twitter would try tagging tweets, sending to the Digg page itself and asking for Diggs. The DiggURL makes it simple and straightforward; if you have an account, you understand the motive. 4. Users who enjoy the DiggBar will have an easier time voting for your articles Believe it or not, there are users out there that enjoy the DiggBar. It makes it easy to see the best comments, share good links and most importantly vote on articles that they deem worthy. Digg has been ever changing to make it harder and harder to vote for stories that users enjoy. The DiggBar is a step in the opposite direction, as users can vote quickly and easily, without having to flip back to the Digg page where they discovered the content. Undoubtedly, the DiggBar will increase user votes and votes for your content
Mother’s Day Coupons from GoodOrient.com
Mother's Day is just around the corner, falling on May 11th this year, and consumers will be looking for the best online bargains they can find.